Evolution Is Indeed an Observable Science - Creationism Is Not Credible

Summary


In his letter of July 22, Joe Scofield accuses Charles Plummer of "selecting evidence to support his materialistic faith in evolution whilst ignoring all evidence to the contrary".

In that letter and the subsequent letter on July 29 he goes on to select evidence to support his spiritualistic faith in creationism whilst rubbishing all evidence to the contrary. But the problem with his "evidence" is that it's all negative. He tries (and fails) to pick holes in the scientist's case, but only succeeds in demonstrating his own failure to even attempt to understand the theory of evolution.

See the full content of this document

Extract


Evolution Is Indeed an Observable Science - Creationism Is Not Credible

He says that, if modern plants had evolved "one from another", there should be examples in the fossil record of "intermediate types" between the "350,000 different types of plant in the world today". So, 3...

See the full content of this document

Sponsored links




ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.

Contents in vLex United Kingdom

Explore vLex

For Professionals

For Partners

Company